Insurance Law Section
ILS Events Calendar



20th Annual Insurance Law Institute (Dallas)

Nov. 12-13, 2015 – Cityplace Conference Center, Dallas - Presented by The University of Texas School of Law and The Insurance Law Section of the State Bar of Texas (More)

Lynd Decision Upholds Longstanding Canons of Policy Construction Favoring Insureds
by Tae Andrews

Casenote: RSUI Indem. Co. v. Lynd Co (Tex. May 8, 2015).

A recent Supreme Court of Texas decision reemphasized well-established rules of insurance policy interpretation that benefit policyholders. In 2005, the Lynd Company purchased two layers of insurance to cover various properties. Westchester Fire Insurance Company provided primary coverage up to $20 million per occurrence.  RSUI Indemnity Company provided excess coverage for losses exceeding $20 million, up to $480 million per occurrence. 

One such “occurrence”—Hurricane Rita—struck in September 2005.  The storm damaged fifteen of Lynd’s properties. The parties agreed that a single “occurrence” caused all of the damage and that Lynd’s losses totaled just over $24.5 million.  After Westchester paid its $20 million limit, RSUI refused to pay the remaining $4.5 million and instead paid Lynd $750,000. 

RSUI cited the excess policy’s “Scheduled Limit of Liability” endorsement as the basis for its denial of coverage. Lynd sued RSUI to recover the difference between its $24.5 million in losses and the $20,750,000 Westchester and RSUI paid out under the policies. As a result, the question of whether coverage existed under the excess policy depended on the interpretation of ...(Continue)

Recent Decisions
Appeals Court Affirms JNOV for Insurer on Hurricane Ike Claim  
John Davis d/b/a J.D. House of Style v. National Lloyds Ins. Co. Tx 1-Houston 10/13/15—
Appellate court holds trial court properly entered a take nothing judgment for insurer after jury finds that the damaged property had an actual cash value of zero despite jury finding that insurer breached the contract and acted with bad faith.
District Court Agrees with Insurer, Stays Execution of Final Judgment Based on Use of Incorrect Interest Rate  
Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Stewart SD Tx 10/10/15—
Insurer's failure to deposit policy proceeds or post bond does not jeopardize jurisdiction, stay warranted based on clerical error
District Court Denies Motion to Remand, Applies Federal Pleading Standard  
Monclat Hospitality LLC v Landmark American Insurance Co. ND Tx 10/8/15—
Bare legal conclusions insufficient to support plausible right to relief against adjuster
Western District Court Refuses Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit in Favor of Pending Florida Case  
Maxum Indemnity Co. v. BRW Floors Inc. WD Tx 10/7/15—
Insured's purposeful contacts in Texas satisfy personal jurisdiction rules
Court Refuses to Remand Case to State Court, Finding Amount-in-Controversy Requirement Satisfied  
Villarreal v. State Farm Lloyds SD Tx 10/7/15—
Insured's pre-suit demand and claim for exemplary damages exceeds $75,000
In Revised Opinion, Fifth Circuit Dismisses Federal Antitrust Claims, but Reverses Ruling on State-Based Claims  
Sanger Insurance Agency v. HUB International Limited 5th Cir 10/1/15—
Court finds insurance agency had antitrust standing, but McCarran-Ferguson Act exemption applied
District Court Remands Case Back to State Court for Lack of Diversity  
Denley Group LLC v Safeco Insurance Co. of Indiana ND Tx 9/30/15—
Insured's claims against adjuster sufficient under Texas pleading standard for violation of Chapter 541
Trial Court Abused Its Discretion By Not Abating Bad Faith Claims In UIM Action  
In Re Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company Tx 3-Austin 9/30/15—
The Austin Court of Appeals finds that because of the unique nature of UIM coverage an insurer should not be subjected to bad faith discovery until after the insured establishes its breach of contract claim.
Trial Court Abused Its Discretion By Refusing To Enforce Policy's Appraisal Clause  
In Re GuideOne National Insurance Company Tx 7-Amarillo 9/29/15—
Amarillo Court of Appeals finds that an appraisal clause that can only be invoked by the insurer does not violate public policy.
Fourteenth Court of Appeals Splits on Construction of Policy Language  
Nasser v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. Tx 14-Houston 9/29/15—
The issue of whether a fence is part of the residence premises has divided the Houston Court of Appeals -- Fourteenth District
More Recent Decisions
Section News
Message From the Chair

Dear Insurance Law Section Member:

As Chair of the Section for the 2015-16 year, I want to personally thank you for joining the Insurance Law Section of the State Bar of Texas. Whether yo... (Continued)

More Section News